Balancer Labs Shuts Down After $116M Hack, Shifts to DAO Model.

Balancer Labs, the original developer behind one of decentralized finance’s earliest automated market makers, is shutting down its corporate operations after a $116 million exploit exposed deep structural weaknesses in its business model.

Co-founder Fernando Martinelli confirmed the decision in a community forum post, describing the company as having become “a liability rather than an asset” following the November 2025 breach that drained funds from Balancer v2 pools across multiple chains.

The move underscores a broader reckoning across DeFi. While Balancer’s underlying technology remains intact, Martinelli acknowledged that its economic framework combined with repeated security incidents ultimately eroded trust and sustainability. Despite early momentum and integrations with major protocols like Aave, Gnosis, Lido, and CoW Swap, the company struggled to maintain viability without consistent revenue streams.

As part of its reset, the protocol will transition fully to a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) structure. Core contributors are expected to migrate to a new operating entity, while governance will introduce sweeping tokenomics reforms, including eliminating BAL emissions, restructuring fees to benefit the DAO treasury, and launching a buyback program to support token holders.

The restructuring also narrows Balancer’s focus to high-value products such as liquidity bootstrapping pools, stablecoin and liquid staking token pools, and its reCLAMM innovation, while scaling back its presence across multiple chains.The timing reflects mounting pressure across the crypto sector. With liquidity shrinking after the 2025 market peak and incentive-driven growth models losing relevance, protocols are being forced to confront sustainability without external capital support. Balancer’s total value has fallen sharply from $3.3 billion to approximately $158 million, though core usage remains active.

CEO Marcus Hardt described the transition as challenging but necessary, pointing to continued product differentiation and resilient integrations as signs of long-term potential.Community response has been mixed, balancing cautious optimism with concerns about execution risks in a leaner, fully decentralized structure. For Balancer, however, the decision signals a deliberate shift away from corporate overhead toward a model that prioritizes resilience and autonomy.

Martinelli, who will not retain a formal role, framed the move as a strategic reset rather than a retreat one that may ultimately determine whether Balancer can adapt to a more disciplined era of decentralized finance.